Gas Turbine Project: The Gokart
Last updated 22 February, 2001

Home | Project Diary | My Tools | Contact Me | Links | My Gas Turbine Project | The Afterburner | Turboshaft Engine
Jet-kart | Pulsejet-powered Kart | Kitsets | Troubleshooting pulsejets | Valveless Pulsejets | Ramjets Explained
100lbs-thrust pulsejet | Turbo-turbine FAQ | Chrysler's Turbine-cars | How Pulsejets Work | Flying Platform
Metal Spinning | My Lockwood engine | Starting a pulsejet | Making Reed-valves Last | Pulsejet-powered speedboat
Pulse Detonation Engines | Thrust Augmentors

NEW! -- First kart chasis tests under pulse-jet power (1 February 2001)

The Holy Grail?
I think that just about everyone who has built, or contemplated building their own jet engine has also dreamed of using such an engine to power a small vehicle such as a gokart.

Jet gokart
Once I got the kart built I couldn't wait until
the power-shaft gearbox was done so I tried
it out with my some of my bigger pulsejets.
CLICK HERE for the details
 

Well, in order to make some use of the power shaft addition to my gas turbine engine I figured I might as well build such a vehicle.

The Components
Obviously some of the key components of any wheeled vehicle are: the wheels -- so that's where I started.

After checking out prices for reasonably sized pneumatic wheels I discovered that the cheapest option was buying a couple of cheap "made in China" loading trolleys. These cost me NZ$59 each (giving me two wheels), whereas exactly the wheels sold alone would have cost NZ$45 a pop! Buying the two trolleys saved me $56 over buying the wheels individually -- AND I got about 18 feet of steel tubing and two axles as well.

It will be interesting to see how well these wheels stand up to the punishment a gokart gives them. Although they have twin ball bearings and, by virtue of coming off a loading trolley, should be expected to handle the weight of a kart, I'm left wondering how well they'll hold up under the side-loads that might be encountered when cornering.

Next on the shopping list was some way of transfering the power from my engine's power-shaft to the rear driven wheel. I settled on a chain drive and managed to pick up some hefty looking sprockets and some chain that provide an extra 1:3 reduction ratio.

The chasis will be built from some 1 inch square section tubing I've got lying around and the various bits of pipe I'll be able to scavange from the trolley frames.

Basic Design
The kart will be a rear-engined, one-wheel-drive (so it won't need a differential) vehicle without suspension (that's why I needed pneumatic tires ;-)

There'll be no clutch, mainly because the free-turbine attached to the engine's power-shaft also acts as a torque converter.

Gearing will be fixed and I've calculated the intial ratios to give me a top speed of 20Km/H (around 12 MPH) -- no point in getting too carried away because this thing won't have disk brakes (hmm.. brakes, maybe I'd better add at least some kind of braking mechanism onboard!).

However, at this stage I have absolutely no idea whether my small gas-turbine engine will have enough power to get a gokart up to this kind of mind-altering speed -- or even budge it into any kind of forward motion at all. And while I think of it, I'd better make sure that I have the output shaft turning the right direction so that the kart doesn't take off backwards -- that would be a real disapointment.

Engine Modifications
As you can see from the pictures on my gas-turbine engine page, the prototype of my engine is rather large with a huge vertical combustion chamber. Obviously this would be a little impractical on a gokart so I'm also building a smaller horizontal combustor and will also make a new oil-tank/pump, designed to be a little more robust and capable of handling the bumps and bangs it'll get.

I'm also giving some thoughts to the issue of adding baffles to the oil tank to ensure there's no way the pump will run dry during high-speed cornering (oh yeah... I'm allowed to dream :-)

Another thing I'm not sure about is the amount of back-pressure that a stalled power turbine might produce when the kart is stationary and the engine is at idle. My solution to this (if it becomes a problem) is to have a manually operated wastegate on the power-turbine which is linked to the throttle. When the engine is idling the wastegate will be open, allowing the gases to bypass the power turbine -- but when the throttle is increased above idle the wastegate will be closed and all the gasses will be made to flow through the turbine.

Latest News
I've now laid out the chasis in preparation for welding to begin in earnest.

As you can see from the picture on the right -- this is only just going to fit into the free space I have available on my workshop floor. Goodness knows how I'm going to get it in and out without moving a whole lot of gear out of the way.

It's actually bigger than I thought it would be -- but that's good because I want plenty of space for mounting the engine(s) and working on them in position without having to remove them to get to the important bits for maintenance or modification.

This will in effect be my new engine test-bed.

Previously
I've all but completed the front-wheel assembly of the kart including the steering components.

I've given the front-end an 8 degreen kingpin inclination and 8 degrees of caster -- which is adjustable to 12 degrees.

The kingpin inclination provides the self-centering and the caster angle provides stability at speed while also ensuring that the wheels operate at the best camber angle when turning.


Here are some pictures of the front stub-axle assemblies which were made from a turned vertical shaft (which has a ball-race inside) to which two bolts have been welded -- one for the wheel axle, the other for the steering arm.

The system is designed to allow for easy adjustment of the steering alignment and the effective connection point of the tie-rod is offset from the steering arm so as to provide the correct ackerman angles.

Part of the reason this is taking so long is that I'm grossly over-designing and over-engineering this thing -- it's a bad habit I know!

The rear axle is turned from a solid bar of steel which is a meter long (about 39 inches) -- something you might think is a little too large for my small lathe that only has 10 inches between centers.

As you can see from these pictures, I used my "big" 4-jaw chuck (mainly because it has a bigger hole through it than the 3-jaw) and pushed as much through as I could while still allowing the live-center to be installed.

The result was a whole lot of axle passing through the lathe spindle and hanging out the back -- but it worked very well and allowed me to turn down the ends of the axle to suit the wheel hubs, and thread them for a retaining nut.

Previously
Yesterday I picked up the rest of the RHS steel box-section tube I need to start work on the gokart chasis and, with Christmas coming up, and I plan to spend a few hours on this project tomorrow so, with any luck, I'll be able to add some pictures to this page.

A Rolling Test-bed For My Pulse-Jet Engines
Before I can fill the backlog of orders for my pulse-jet kitsets I'm need to test them out on a rolling platform (as opposed to the static test frame I'm using now).

I'll be starting the tests by mounting one of my largest pulse-jet engines (75 pounds of thrust) on the kart which should easily get the thing up to 40 mph.

Click to download video For those who haven't seen it, footage from one of my very early pulse-jet prototype test-runs can be seen here in RealVideo format (note: it doesn't stream, you'll have to wait for it to load up but it's only 450K so only takes a couple of minutes.) Although it appears that the engine gets white-hot it's actually an illusion caused by the camera's heightened sensitivity to the infra-red end of the spectrum. And no, it's not strapped to the roof of my car -- that's just an unfortunate camera angle -- it's actually bolted to my gas-turbine engine test-stand.

The sparks coming out the back of this early prototype are actually fragments of the reed-valves as they hammer themselves to death -- not an uncommon problem with these engines and something which has been a problem for all pulse-jet designers (until now ;-)

My new pulse-jet design is much shorter than this, has optional direct fuel-injection, and uses my new electroplated V-shaped reed-valve system which produces much more power and lasts far longer than the old "petal" valves commonly used on these engines. I'm actually thinking of patenting the special process I've developed for creating long-life, high-efficiency valves because it makes such a huge difference to performance and reliability. Having searched all the online and off-line literature I have access to, I've seen nothing else even remotely like this process -- probably because development of pulse-jet engines seems to completely stopped with the commercial development of the gas-turbine in the late 1950's.

 
Home | Project Diary | My Tools | Contact Me | Links | My Gas Turbine Project | The Afterburner | Turboshaft Engine
Jet-kart | Pulsejet-powered Kart | Kitsets | Troubleshooting pulsejets | Valveless Pulsejets | Ramjets Explained
100lbs-thrust pulsejet | Turbo-turbine FAQ | Chrysler's Turbine-cars | How Pulsejets Work | Flying Platform
Metal Spinning | My Lockwood engine | Starting a pulsejet | Making Reed-valves Last | Pulsejet-powered speedboat
Pulse Detonation Engines | Thrust Augmentors